Australian Aboriginals, Dani (Papua) and San ("Bushmen") Type1 societies

After watching the movie Australia (which was recommended to me by my friend E) featuring Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman yesterday evening I am today watching the movie The Gods must be Crazy (parts 1&2). I've had the urge to write some more about type 1 and type 2 human groups on Earth (see article As above so below: Earth and Galactic humans).

Type 1 human groups in their ideal form would actually be a carbon copy of the culture of the Ancient Earth androgynous humans, if not these humans themselves. The Ancient Earth humans moved about as individuals or in small groups of friends and family. They lived a simple live devoid of technology but with a high emphasis on the use of spiritual abilities. Type 2 human groups on the other hand are those whose ancestors once lived like type 1 humans but later generations embraced technology. Type 2 cultures often have had 'first contact' with technological societies and have either abandoned their simple way of life in favor of technology or have integrated technology into their lifestyles in significant ways. Type 2 cultures are often led by Alien groups or by bloodlines set up by Alien groups. Often type2 societies also have some type1 tribal or village groups living in the type2 predominant society.


So in order to get a really good mental picture of type1/type 2, imagine a spectrum ranging from 0% to 100%. At 0% you have type one, idealized by the Ancient Earth human (or other indigenous human planetary guardian group on another star system) while at 100% you have a once-indigenous human (planetary guardian) people who have now fully embraced technology.

On Earth today, the only truly (fully) type 1 cultures remaining are those that have not yet had first contact with any modern society. Some of these humans exist in the Amazon forest, some in Ecuador and others in Papua New Guinea, perhaps in Africa's Congo forest etc. After these humans you have those humans who maintain minimal contact with modern ways, like some of those in Andaman and Nicobar as well as in Ecuador and other places. After these you have human groups who although they have had some or even significant contact with modern way of life, still hold on to large aspects of their old way of life. For these humans you could point out perhaps very small pockets of San people ('Bushmen'), perhaps some Australian Aboriginal people and some Native Indians from various places around the world.

In Africa there are perhaps roughly 5 main groups of indigenous people who span the type1/type 2 spectrum. At the very far end of type 1 you have the San and the Pygmies. There are then a large bulk of type1 Africans who live in family/clan settings. Next come the African type1/type2s who are predominantly type1 groups led by type2 Africans. Then you have the African type2s, who form a small minority.

The San have lived an ancient way of life from over 50,000 years ago to the present. The San in particular are arguably the first human indigenous group to result from the creation of the prototype human during the experiments to create the current Earth humans (see The Akan book section 7.4). It has been shown that this group has genetic markers that no other human group has while other human groups (perhaps all of them) have markers that are found in the San. The San even have eyes like some Asians and the Native Indian people. The Pygmy also resulted from the experiments and were likely a prototype predating other common African groups.


After the San and the Pygmies, you have a large bulk of type 1 cultures spread all over Africa. For Africa, these are perhaps what we may call the true stereotypical type 1 culture. They exist strictly on the family and clan levels and have strong social systems that promote a sort of egalitarianism that is based on natural roles and functions of men, women and children. These African groups are also very much decentralized and close to nature. They are ruled by elders and clan leaders in a council format. They often have strong magical systems based on their old relationships with nature spirits. These type 1's are the major bulk of the true African human guardians who perform specific rituals to maintain the ecosystem, the planet and the solar system. In West Africa, the Mossi as a general group (who include the Dogon and the Dagaare -- Malidoma Some's people), the Guans of Ghana, the Plateau Nigerians as well as the Jola/Diola of Senegal/Guinea are some examples. In Southern Africa the Batonga and the Tonga-ila are examples. These are only a few examples, there are several more. For some of the functions performed by African human guardian groups, see section 7.5 of The Akan book.

After this group of type1s come the type 1/type 2 Africans. One could say that the type 1 group just mentioned, together with this type1/type2 group I am about to describe form the bulk of Black Africans in the pre-modern era.

The main difference between the type1/type2s and the true type1s I have just described is in their forms of society and government. The true type1s are very decentralized, spread over an area and maintain loose allegiances. Their societies are structured around the family/clan system. The type1/type2s however have societies structured around the clan/city-state system. They also have hierarchical forms of government that maintain 'bloodlines' who have 'divine right to rule'. That should tell the reader something. The African type1/type2s are led by bloodlines set up by descendants of the Sirian-Reptilian ETs. For the Akan, there is a strong connection with the Enki-Horus-Thoth group of Sirian-Reptilian ETs, which is perhaps why bird totems feature so strongly among the Akan. The 5 bird totems are Crow, Eagle, Falcon/Hawk, Parrot and Vulture (The Akan, sections 4.2, 4.3). I've only recently learned that the Eagle is another Akan bird totem. Other West African groups identify with various totem animals.

(Aside: The Akan rulers were (and still are) carried around in Palanquins at shoulder length during festivals. They spoke (and still speak) through linguists but not directly to the people. Of course these days it is done only as a matter of 'protocol' however both practices harken back to the era of the Sirian-Reptilian ETs when these 'masters' were carried around at shoulder level on platforms. Also the ET masters would speak through the priestly class (the linguist) who would presumably translate the message of the master to the people. Of course today the Akan Chiefs (descendants of the Enki-Horus bloodlines) speak in the same language as the people, but the practice of speaking through a linguist is still carried down because of 'tradition'. As I have said, when it comes to the Akan (and with some other African groups as well) if one has the cultural-linguistic key, one can learn a lot.)

What I have found really interesting is that the true type1s are almost identical to the type1/type2s, the major difference being how the latter organized society. For instance among the people of Ghana, the Guans were the first to arrive. This group is totally type1. Then much later on the Akan arrived. The Akan are type1/type2. Yet the Akan language is genetically related to the Guan language. The reason behind it is that the Akans are predominantly type1, however it is their leaders (the royalty) who are type 2. The royalty were effectively leading bands of type1s. Another piece of evidence to support this is that the Akan people can be found in Ghana and in Cote d'Ivoire. The Akan royals who traditionally had the most power were Asante leaders (falcon-[Enki/Horus] clan). They dominated the other Akan and all the local people they found in the place they settled at. Some of the Akan people rebelled and run off to Cote d'Ivoire. Many of those who left the realm of influence of the Asante then set up decentralized societies, in effect going back to the old family/clan system. A third example is that although the type1/type2 Akan had a centralized form of government, their citizens continued to live type1 lifestyles like the other type1s they found already living where the Akan settled. Hunters would go into the forest and stay for several weeks at a time. People still lived in small family groups in their respective villages. Yet the common people were still lorded over by their royals.


Looking at the rest of Africa, all the major groups of Africans who we now know as the major African ethnic groups, those that had more centralized forms of government centered round a High Chief or King are examples of type1/type2 Africans following the Sirian system. These are the strong warrior-type cultures. Of these African groups you could mention over 300 (every African country has at least a couple) but we could list a few examples. In West Africa, in addition to the Akan there are also the Mande groups, the Yoruba and the Ibo. In Central and East Africa we could give as examples the Baganda of Uganda and the Kikuyu of Kenya as examples that most will recognize. In Zimbabwe, the Shona people are one example. It is interesting to note that the name Mugabe is actually also a title for ancient kings of the region of Zimbabwe, so this should tell the reader that Robert Mugabe also derives from those type 2 bloodlines. In Southern Africa the best examples that most will recognize are the Sotho people (Basutho of Lesotho), the Swazi (who still have a functioning type1/type2 system based on the Sirius model) and the Zulu.

Interestingly, the Warrior-type1/type2s groups migrated to the regions they occupied after the pure type1s made it there. This is where stories of migrations from areas like Mesopotamia and Egypt come into the picture. In West Africa, all the major type1/type2s (Akan, Ewe, Igbo, Mande, Yoruba) have stories of migrations 'from the North'. In contrast, the pure type1s have stories of having been at their place for ages, or sometimes having arrived at their location either from ancient migration or from a hole in the ground or from a cave (read Inner Earth).


In terms of spirituality, I find it interesting that in Africa the pure type1 societies have traditionally been 'producers' of 'spiritual technology' while the type1/type2s have been 'consumers' of this 'spiritual technology'. Among the Akans, there are shamans but these sometimes get their medicine 'from the north' (i.e. read from the Mossi) or from the Guans. Other times they are a representative of a nature spirit entity like a river, mountain or sea deity. Both type1s and type1/type2s have witchcraft. An interesting group of Akans is the Nzema subgroup. These Akans arrived earlier on before the other Major Akan groups (Akyem, Asante, Denkyira, Fante etc) and mixed with the type1 Guans so now the Nzema have some serious medicine. But by and large the type1/type2s get their medicine from the pure type1s. I found it interesting that in Central Africa the type1 Batonga and Tonga-ila people performed the function of 'providers of spiritual technology' for the neighbouring type1/type2 groups. In any case because of the warrior-type 'Sirian-oriented' nature of the type1/type2s their leaders were very often in wars.

Before talking about the pure type2s, there is another group in Africa which I shall refer to as the type2/type1s in Africa. These can be described as 'type 2s gone native'. The type 2/type1s are groups like the Dinka others of the Nilotic group found in Southern Sudan, Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia. These groups include type 2 Africans who mixed with type1s to become mostly type1.


Finally you have the African type 2s. Ethopia perhaps most accurately typifies the African type2. The Omoro, the Amhara and some groups in Eritrea and Somalia are examples. This group are often referred to as the Cushites. African type2s actually derive from the Sirian system and are more closely related to 'native Sirian ETs'. This group also has very centralized governing systems.

One may be able to see how African type1, type1/type2 and type2 cultures have Homo Erectus, Sirian-Reptilian and Sirian-Guardian/Ancient Earth Human genetic influences (The Akan section 7.4). The basic idea is that as a general rule of thumb, the more type1 they come the less Sirian-Reptilian is there. The strong African type-2s have significant amounts of Sirian-Reptilian (perhaps leaning on the Sirian side, in the case of the Ethiopians for example).


Elsewhere on the planet, in South America to be speficic some of the Indigenous Native Indian groups such as Aymara, Quechua groups of Bolivia, Chile and Peru typify type 1 groups that were present before the more type2-leaning Inca arrived. In the Brazilian Amazon, most of the Native Indians were very much type1. In Central America the Aztec/Maya groups were also type2-leaning, which suggests Sirian-Reptilian installation of bloodlines and influence on the local, perhaps predominantly type 2 cultures of the Aztec and Inca just as was done in Africa. Among the Native Indians of North America it seems that there is a great range between pure type1 groups and the type1/type2s. I've found it interesting to observe that those on the East Coast were more closely leaning towards type 2 (because some bands on the East were led by one chief rather than a council) while those in the central strip were more closely type 1 because they often had councils like some African type1s. In any case there were smaller groups like the Pomo who definitely had type1 culture. The Inuit were predominantly type1. This would be the case for many of the groups across the northern region of the planet (Saami, Nenets, Evenks, etc). The list goes on. For more on this see the article As Above So Below: Earth and Galactic humans.

In Asia, there are extremes. China and India (together with Egypt and Mesopotamia) represent the extreme of type 2 in pre-modern Earth cultures, especially because they actually had alien 'demi-gods' ruling over the people in ancient times. These societies were also very much centralized. However throughout Asia there are various type1 as well as type1/type2 cultures. All this is of course speaking about pre-modern times.

In Europe, if you take out those humans that were influenced by the Lyran current (umbrella term) there were type1/type2s (Celts etc) as well as pure type2s. Iran is one example. The Sumerian/Mesopotamian current that went on to strongly affect much of Europe (Elamites, Phoenicians, Turkic) especially Rome and Persia are strongly type 2. Eastern Europe has a strong type2 presence (Turkic, Elamite) mixed with the Lyran current. Western Europe has a type2 presence (Celt-type1/type2, Sirian-Phoenician-type2), strong in some places, mixed with the Lyran current. The Ashkenazi Jews are perhaps as far right type2 as the Chinese, perhaps even more. The true Ashkenazi Jews are type2 Sirian-Reptilian (leaning on the Reptilian side) however most Ashkenazis have significant Lyran current influence.

(Somewhat related: Interestingly, for those who have read Edgar J Steele's book 'Defensive Racism', it could be eye-opening to apply type1/type2 analysis to his (Steele's) IQ hierarchy or climbing trend (based on Psychology tests to measure intelligence) of Blacks->Latinos->Whites->Asians(Chinese/Japanese esp)->Ashkenazi Jews. I suppose you can connect the dots. I wondered why Native Indians and Polynesians were missing from the list, perhaps they'll be at the far left side together with Blacks and Latinos. One key trend here is the Alien, especially the 'Reptilian Factor' that increases as you move towards the right. I suppose he was speaking in general terms though. In any case, I quite enjoyed reading his book).